Harassment, and “Premature Deaths” 1989 - 2004 Part I

Controversies

Here is a quote from my post of 15 May 2014:—

"As I warned (or should that be "threatened"!) in my very first post to this blog, I'll occasionally post something on what I'll call "wider issues". This is the first one, and by comparison with others that I may do in future, it's a fairly small and innocuous one."

I had been wavering over the series of not-so-innocuous posts that I'll do now. My decision to proceed was prompted by a couple of recent news items: firstly, the improbable claim made by Cambridge Professor Peter Wadhams that three scientists investigating the melting of Arctic ice may have been assassinated within the space of a few months; see  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11762680/Three-scientists-investigating-melting-Arctic-ice-may-have-been-assassinated-professor-claims.html

Secondly, a more credible claim appeared; concerning the remote hacking and taking over control of a car; see
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/07/22/car-hacking-just-got-real-hackers-disable-suv-on-busy-highway/

This is really just the mainstream media catching up at last with something that has been long known in the technological "underground" — that for many years, just about any modern car could be hacked and brought under remote control by anyone with the relevant knowledge and equipment. Even orthodox specialists have been aware of this for some time; see the paper published by the IEEE in May 2010: "Experimental Security Analysis of a Modern Automobile" at  http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5504804&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5504804

This technology is sometimes called "Boston Brakes," and has been claimed, in one form or another, as the assassination technique used against Ian Stuart Donaldson (founder of Skrewdriver); Princess Diana; Jörg Haider (long-time leader of the Austrian Freedom Party and later Chairman of the Alliance for the Future of Austria), and others.

An old article resurrected

I wrote the following article back in 2004, in a style conforming to that of a "samizdat" publication with a more political stance than this generally apolitical blog has. Although it's now somewhat dated, I've decided to leave it as it stands, apart from some occasional minor editing, shown in slate blue. This is mainly because I'm not motivated enough to do any major editing of it. To make it more manageable, I've decided to split it into four parts.

Generally, it discusses the premature deaths of individuals who were associated with perpetual motion/free energy research over the relatively brief "snapshot" period from 1989 to 2004. More cases could have been added of course, both before and after that time interval, and even during it.



[quote begins]

[Introductory quote]

Methods used against positive ideas

“It is enlightening to review the standard means whereby our masters combat positive ideas and movements. There is a pattern in such tactics which constructive forces will do well to study. The first tactic is suppression and determined non-recognition of the rebel and his works. The press will unanimously give the well-known ‘silent treatment.’ Even at this early stage, if the movement gives promise of becoming significant, assassination is considered and carried out if possible. The murder of young Newton Armstrong, Jr., in San Diego, on the night of March 31, 1962, is a case in point. Quoting from Che Guevara’s book on guerilla warfare and the question of when to resort to assassination:

It is generally against the policy of the Communist Party to resort to assassination . . . However it requires two criteria and a high-level policy decision . . . The criteria for the individual in question are that he must be highly effective and it must serve some sort of example — some sort of a highly effective example.

The next tactic is the Smear through libel, distortion, misrepresentation and the sowing of confusion wherever possible. This may be a negative smear with the purpose of destroying the effectiveness of an enemy or a positive smear for the purpose of building a haze around the truth to enable a disintegrative movement to develop. The falsification of the truth about Castro which was indulged in by virtually all of the press, and, of course the State Department, is a classic example of this. The Smear is usually started as an underground whispering campaign that viciously builds up to an outright and overt campaign, with the ‘free press’ called into play. The object is to isolate enemies of the present regime and discredit them. The third tactic is infiltration into the movement and/or the building up of false leadership in order to sabotage the movement at the optimum time, meanwhile diverting patriot energies into harmless or controlled activities. The fourth and final stage is called upon only as a last resort, after the movement or philosophy has become institutionalized and is immune to grosser tactics. This is to ‘interpret’ it so as to bring it as closely as possible into conformity with approved patterns. (Characteristically, the conflicting philosophies of both Jesus Christ and Friedrich Nietzsche have suffered this deadening interpretation.) Two or more of the above maneuvers are usually used simultaneously. For instance, in addition to the suppression of his Imperium, Yockey was also victimized by the Smear; and he was also in danger of assassination — and his enigmatic end settled the problem. Now it is with no gift of prophecy that one may predict that this present republication of his work will call forth the same sequence.” 

— Francis Parker Yockey, Imperium, first published by Westropa Press, 1948. Introduction to the edition published by The Noontide Press, Sausalito, California.¹

[Main comment begins]

Students of the history of the present System, which has been described by British writer David Myatt as a “world-wide, repressive anti-Aryan tyranny,”² will be aware that its advance has been accompanied by the untimely deaths of vast numbers of people. Often these have been unequivocally murders, for example the seven million or more Ukrainians killed by starvation in the late 1920’s and 1930’s, at the orders of Lazar Kaganovich, variously known as the “Wolf of the Kremlin” or the “Butcher of the Ukraine.” And the twelve thousand murdered during the early years of World War 2 in Vinnitsa for being “enemies of the people.” And the fifteen thousand Poles similarly murdered in the Katyn Forest massacre, originally blamed on the Nazis. Probably the deaths of the 2.1 million Germans among the 16.6 million who were ethnically cleansed from Poland, Czechoslovakia and Hungary after World War 2 should also be regarded as murders, together with the 1.5 million more who died in prisoner of war camps during and after that war. [Further information on these latter cases can be found at http://www.amazon.com/Hellstorm-Death-Nazi-Germany-1944-1947/dp/1494775069 and http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4661358/]

The above examples are all taken from Robert Griffin’s book The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds.³ To them should also be added further tens of millions of Soviet citizens systematically murdered in the years following the 1917 revolution. In those murders, as in other instances such as Vinnitsa and Katyn, a particular effort was made to kill the most intelligent and capable members of the population.

There is also a smaller number of “premature deaths” where a prominent victim dies under circumstances where murder cannot be proved, but where the timing of the death is very beneficial to the System. This sort of thing is not often discussed, although some examples can be found in The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed.⁴

Premature Deaths in New Energy

This rather macabre topic has been introduced because inventors and others trying to expose the truth about new energy technology have also suffered a disturbingly high number of “premature deaths,” — high, that is, in proportion to the small (but growing) number of people within the general population. To put this last point another way, on a purely actuarial basis, and without invoking any conspiracy theories, such people are undoubtedly in high-risk occupations.

As will be seen, it is not always the inventors themselves who suffer the “premature deaths;” in fact with some of the best examples of Free Energy it was the high-profile individuals who tried to introduce the technology who died, just as some significant breakthrough was imminent.

It will also be seen that besides those who were involved purely with Free Energy research, several of the inventors discussed below were also involved with work on radioactive remediation. This is technology that would simply and efficiently transmute radioactive material, including nuclear waste, into safe, non-radioactive end products. It is obviously in direct opposition to the interests of those who are trying, and largely succeeding, in turning nuclear power into Politically Incorrect technology, and who are promoting the supposed “difficulty” of dealing with radioactive waste as one of their main pieces of propaganda. In any case, radioactive remediation attracts opposition every bit as vicious as Free Energy does.

References and Notes

1. This Introduction appears over the signature of Willis Carto, but evidence has been submitted that it was mostly written by Professor Revilo P. Oliver. See http://revilo-oliver.com/rpo/Imperium_intro.html.
2. Cosmic Reich — The Life & Thoughts of David Myatt, Renaissance Press, 1995, p19. [Myatt, an apostate from his earlier views, is now generally scorned. Nevertheless, I still believe his earlier noble vision of an Aryan Galactic Empire would be a far better long-term future for the White race than the genocide by race replacement that will clearly occur otherwise, as long as Whites remain Earthbound with current trends continuing].
3. Robert S. Griffin, The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds, 1st Books Library, 2001, Chapter 21.
4. Douglas Reed, The Controversy of Zion, Veritas Publishing Co Pty Ltd, Australia, 1985.

[to be continued in Part II, with cases]